| Typical electrical capacity | 5–25 MVA | 10–40 MVA | 20–90+ MVA | Confirm transformer, electrode-column, busbar, and utility-grid capacity under continuous operation. |
| Indicative carbide output | Approximately 5–25 tonnes/day | Approximately 15–45 tonnes/day | Approximately 30–120+ tonnes/day | Use guaranteed output at the specified raw-material quality, not the maximum nameplate rating. |
| Specific electricity consumption | 3,200–3,600 kWh/t carbide | 3,000–3,400 kWh/t carbide | 2,800–3,200 kWh/t carbide | Require a performance guarantee based on measured energy per saleable tonne, including start-up and electrode losses. |
| Approximate electricity cost at US$0.07/kWh | US$224–252/t carbide | US$210–238/t carbide | US$196–224/t carbide | Recalculate using the local tariff, demand charges, power factor penalties, and expected annual load factor. |
| Carbon monoxide gas recovery | Generally unavailable or very limited | Approximately 50–80% of generated gas, subject to sealing quality | Approximately 85–98% with a properly sealed furnace and gas-cleaning system | Verify gas composition, pressure control, flare capacity, emergency venting, and permitted reuse or destruction route. |
| Particulate capture potential | Approximately 70–85% with local extraction | Approximately 90–97% | Typically 98% or higher when hooding and bag-filter design are correctly sized | Check guaranteed outlet concentration in mg/Nm³, airflow volume, filter temperature, pressure drop, and continuous monitoring provisions. |
| Indicative furnace availability | 85–90% | 88–93% | 90–95% after commissioning and process stabilization | Define availability as scheduled operating hours minus forced outages, excluding planned maintenance agreed in the contract. |
| Electrode consumption | Approximately 18–25 kg/t carbide | Approximately 16–23 kg/t carbide | Approximately 15–22 kg/t carbide | Assess electrode quality, paste baking, column sealing, slipping control, and the cost of electrode breakage. |
| Relative installed capital cost | Low; use index 100 as a baseline | Medium; approximately index 115–135 | High; approximately index 140–180 | Include furnace, transformer, gas cleaning, cooling water, civil works, electrical substation, installation, commissioning, and contingency. |
| Maintenance complexity | Low to medium; higher exposure to dust and heat | Medium; requires reliable hood and sealing systems | High; includes gas circuit, filters, valves, instrumentation, and safety interlocks | Compare annual maintenance cost, critical spare inventory, local service capability, and planned outage duration. |
| Water-cooling requirement | Lower to medium | Medium to high | High; usually requires redundant pumps, heat exchangers, alarms, and emergency cooling | Evaluate water quality, redundancy, leak detection, emergency shutdown, and consequences of cooling failure. |
| Compliance readiness | More difficult where particulate, CO, and visible-emission limits are strict | Generally suitable with correctly designed extraction and filtration | Best fit for stringent emission control and gas-management requirements | Confirm local permits for particulate matter, CO, fugitive emissions, noise, wastewater, hazardous energy, and greenhouse-gas reporting. |
| Automation and data availability | Basic current, voltage, temperature, and alarm monitoring | Distributed control with improved process logging | Advanced control for power, pressure, gas flow, cooling, electrodes, and emissions | Require historian access, alarm records, cybersecurity controls, remote diagnostics, and exportable production data. |
| Best-fit operating situation | Small capacity, lower initial budget, and less restrictive emission conditions | Medium capacity requiring a balance between investment and environmental performance | Large continuous production, high electricity cost, gas-utilization opportunity, and strict permitting | Select according to the lowest risk-adjusted cost per saleable tonne, not the lowest purchase price. |