| Passive RF Detector | Monitors radio-frequency control, telemetry, and video links without transmitting a signal. | Approximately 1–5 km in open, unobstructed conditions; range varies significantly with transmitter power, antenna height, and terrain. | Can often indicate drone activity, communication protocol, direction, and sometimes the control position; usually cannot provide visual confirmation. | Low power consumption, silent operation, rapid alerts, and relatively simple installation. | Less effective against autonomous drones, radio-silent flights, encrypted links, or drones operating outside the monitored frequency range. | Approximately US$500–US$10,000 for portable or fixed monitoring equipment. | Homes, events, construction sites, and security teams needing an affordable first-layer warning system. | ★★★★☆ |
| Short-Range Radar | Uses reflected radio waves to detect moving objects and estimate range, bearing, altitude, and speed. | Approximately 1–10 km for small drones, depending on radar frequency, antenna design, drone size, clutter, and weather. | Provides reliable movement tracks but normally requires optical or RF sensors for drone model or operator identification. | Works day and night, detects radio-silent drones, and can maintain tracks in low visibility. | Higher cost, possible false alarms from birds or other moving objects, and performance can be reduced by buildings, vegetation, and ground clutter. | Approximately US$5,000–US$50,000 for compact or site-level systems. | Industrial facilities, airports, utilities, and locations requiring persistent detection beyond radio-linked drones. | ★★★★☆ |
| Electro-Optical Camera | Uses visible-light cameras to observe and verify airborne objects. | Approximately 0.5–3 km for practical visual confirmation, depending on lens, lighting, weather, drone size, and operator skill. | Excellent potential for visual confirmation, classification, and recording when the drone is within line of sight. | Provides direct evidence, supports human verification, and can distinguish drones from many non-drone targets. | Requires adequate light and visibility; cannot reliably detect concealed, distant, or visually obscured drones by itself. | Approximately US$1,000–US$20,000, excluding advanced analytics or supporting sensors. | Security verification, incident documentation, and sites where visual evidence is important. | ★★★☆☆ |
| Thermal or Infrared Camera | Detects differences in thermal radiation rather than visible color or reflected light. | Approximately 0.3–2 km for practical drone observation; performance depends on thermal contrast, optics, humidity, and atmospheric conditions. | Can support night-time confirmation and tracking, but detailed identification may be limited at long distance. | Operates in darkness and can complement visible cameras in night-security applications. | Usually costs more than standard cameras; rain, fog, humidity, and low thermal contrast can reduce detection quality. | Approximately US$3,000–US$30,000 depending on resolution, lens, and stabilization. | Night surveillance, critical infrastructure, and locations with limited ambient lighting. | ★★★☆☆ |
| Acoustic Detector | Analyzes the characteristic sound patterns produced by drone motors and propellers using microphone arrays. | Approximately 100–500 m in typical outdoor conditions; effective distance decreases with wind, traffic, machinery, and other background noise. | May classify drone sound signatures but generally provides limited model or operator identification. | Low-cost, passive, and useful where radio emissions are absent or unavailable for monitoring. | Short range, sensitive to environmental noise, and less reliable in windy or highly urban environments. | Approximately US$300–US$10,000 for portable or networked systems. | Small sites, temporary security zones, and locations needing an additional low-cost sensor layer. | ★★★☆☆ |
| Multi-Sensor Fusion System | Combines two or more technologies, commonly radar, RF, visible or thermal cameras, and acoustic sensing. | Approximately 1–10 km for initial detection, with shorter practical ranges for detailed visual identification. | Best overall capability because multiple sensors can provide detection, tracking, classification, and visual confirmation. | Improved reliability, fewer single-sensor blind spots, better performance against autonomous or radio-silent drones, and stronger evidence collection. | Highest purchase and integration cost; requires careful calibration, network connectivity, maintenance, and trained operators. | Approximately US$20,000–US$150,000 or more, depending on coverage, software, and installation complexity. | Airports, prisons, military facilities, major events, energy sites, and other high-security locations. | ★★★★★ |